ACM International Science Editing Service

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Editing Services
      • Standard Editing
      • Premium Editing
    • Submission Support Services
      • Graphing
      • Custom Illustration
      • Figure Formatting
      • Journal Specific Formatting
      • Manuscript Review
      • Response to Reviewers
      • Cover Letter Writing
    • Promote your research
    • Translation
  • Create Your Order
    • Editing Services
    • Promote your research
  • Payment
  • Information for Authors
  • Resources
    • ACM:Latest News
    • Writing Tips
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • Overleaf
      • Journal Selection
      • Submit an Article
      • Peer-Review
      • Publication Ethics
      • Research Promotion
      • Abstracts
      • Cover Letters
      • Request for Revision
  • Customer Service
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Terms of Service
      • Privacy Policy
      • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / ACM: Latest News / “Reject with option to resubmit.” Why do editors choose this option?

December 4, 2020 By Teresa Nolan

“Reject with option to resubmit.” Why do editors choose this option?

An editorial decision of “reject with option to resubmit” is inherently confusing, for inexperienced and seasoned authors alike. Has the paper been rejected? Should you revise and resubmit? To complicate matters further, for those journals that offer this option, a “reject with option to resubmit” can have very different meanings. In this blog, we examine the meaning(s) of this editorial decision and discuss why it is used.

Meaning 1: (Serious) major revisions

If the editor asks you to respond to the reviewers’ comments and gives you a deadline for the resubmission, you can assume the editor means “revise and resubmit,” but your paper will be treated as a new submission. But why not just say this? An editor may use “reject with option to resubmit” to mean “revise and resubmit” for a number of reasons:

To emphasize that the revisions required are (seriously) major, going well beyond what would typically be associated with a “major revision.” The editor wants to make it clear that the authors need to write a new paper, not simply enhance the original one.

To make it easier to reject the paper if the revisions/rebuttal are not convincing. The majority of “revise and resubmit” papers are eventually accepted. As commented on by Angela Cochran of the Scholarly Kitchen, “when editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper” [see this Scholarly Kitchen article on whether to revise and resubmit]. This results in editors somewhat reluctantly accepting papers that they consider only “passable” after many rounds of revision. Editors can avoid getting locked in such revision cycles with “reject with option to resubmit.”

To reduce pushback from authors. Authors receiving a “revise and resubmit” may be more likely to refute or ignore the editor’s comments. This can result in a long-drawn-out process that exhausts the authors, reviewers, and editor. “Reject with option to resubmit” indicates that ignored comments will likely be met with a rejection and any rebuttals must be concrete.

If the outcome of the revision is unpredictable. For example, the re-working may destroy the results and/or conclusions. If the editor cannot be sure that the recommended changes would bring the paper over the accept bar, they are likely to choose “reject with option to resubmit.”

To improve the journal’s submission-to-acceptance figures. This is a somewhat controversial point. Some scholars believe “reject with option to resubmit” is a sneaky way for journals to improve their statistics. The clock keeps ticking with “revise and resubmit” papers, often extending the submission-to-acceptance time by months. This is not the case for “reject with option to resubmit” papers [discussed in this blog post on why journals use “reject but resubmit”]. This may the case for a small minority of journals; however, it is far more likely that journals use “reject with option to resubmit” for the reasons outlined above.

Meaning 2: The editor does not want to see your paper again.

If the editor does not ask you describe the changes that have been made to the original paper and does not provide a deadline for resubmission, they likely do not want to see your paper again (unless it is essentially unrecognizable from the original). Editors often use this approach if they liked the concept but thought the execution was irredeemably poor. Additionally, an editor may choose this option if they not want to discourage early-career authors.

If you receive a “reject with option to resubmit” and do not agree with the recommended changes, you are free to submit the original paper to another journal. However, this is not without risks, particularly for specialist topics that have a small pool of reviewers. It is not uncommon for reviewers to be sent the same paper by different journals. As one economics scholar commented, “I had two experiences with reject and resubmit … which ended up in a rejection. In both cases, the editor sent the paper to the same reviewers who had made [up] their minds already” [see this forum discussion on revise and resubmit vs. reject and resubmit].

Conclusion

You may be disheartened to receive a “reject with option to resubmit.” However, remember it gives you a fighting chance. As one scholar commented on Twitter, “I’ve had a couple of papers where they rejected because of reviewer comments that I actually could address, but the editor may not have known I could address (e.g., with other data). Wish I’d have gotten a reject and resubmit” [see this tweet by Jared Rubin on the topic].

Filed Under: ACM: Latest News, Peer-Review Tagged With: article rejected, peer-review, resubmit

ACM中国作者语言润色服务

ACM Chinese Author Language Editing Service homepage 国际科学编辑(ISE)已正式与国际计算机协会(ACM)合作为想要投稿到ACM的作者提供专业服务。

Para autores ACM do Brasil

ACM-brazil Se você quiser ver os nossos serviços para autores ACM em Português, clique aqui para visitar o nosso site.

भारतीय लेखकों के लिए सेवाएं

acm-desktopcta-(4) एसोसिएशन फॉर कंप्यूटिंग मशीनरी (एसीएम) के साथ प्रकाशित करने के लिए देख रहे हैं लेखकों को एक समर्पित सेवा प्रदान करने के लिए इंटरनेशनल साइंस एडिटिंग ने एसीएम के साथ भागीदारी की है।

日本からのACM著者

Japanese link 国際科学編集者(ISE)は国際コンピューター協会(ACM)と正式に提携し、ACMへ投稿する作者に専門的なサービスを提供します。

International Science Editing’s Writing Tips

Effective science writing: quick tips

Focus on the “take-home” message What is the core message of your paper? What is the most important thing you want readers to remember after reading your paper? Can you describe the core message of your paper to a colleague in one minute? Can you condense the paper into 3 to 5 highlights? Can you […]

Copyright © 2025 · INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE EDITING · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

We’ve updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. These updates address new privacy regulations in Europe and apply to everyone who uses International Science Editing including clients, authors and partners.
Click on Settings to view the list of cookies, the different category headings, and/or change the default settings. Please click on “Accept” to continue to use International Science Editing Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT